Pit Bull Q&A
The study we read this week indicated that the average person is biased against pit bulls. If a dog was identified as a pit bull, subjects rated it as less friendly, harder to train, and more aggressive when compared with lookalikes. However, when the dogs were unlabeled, pit bulls did as well as the control group. Is this doggy discrimination based on facts or fear? Because the breed was developed for dog fighting, do they just make bad pets? Or is it the fault of poor training? According to this article from Time magazine, pit bulls are involved with 52% of dog-related deaths and 68% of dog attacks, despite making up only 6% of the dog population. So, these animals are more aggressive than other breeds, on average. But is this due to genetics? Or do humans pick pit bulls specifically because they want a tough pet and train them to be so asocial? Question 1: What breeds are considered pit bulls? A purebred AP...